Reply – Re: NXIVM - part TWO: INVERTS/INVERSIONS\AVERSIONS(to the Ladies) - A Catami...
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: NXIVM - part TWO: INVERTS/INVERSIONS\AVERSIONS(to the Ladies) - A Catamites Bible o Bile!
— by Maestro Maestro Maestro Maestro
Bel,

Thanks for the response.

The real Jews or the original Hebrews -- meaning a people with a distinct genotype and from the same population inhabiting the same geographical area -- were kicked out of the lands they occupied (which the Jews had conquered through committing genocide on the original inhabitants of said lands, the Canaanites) by the Romans two millennia ago and were scattered across the continents; thus annihilated at least as a distinct race and ethnicity.  So what makes a Jew a Jew today is not his race but his witting association with {or, in the case of an atheist, his nonrepudiation of and partial deference to} the Jewish religion.  This attribute incidentally the Karaites themselves, by definition, share with the mainstream Rabbinical Jews.  From the horse's mouth: https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/498027/jewish/Are-Jews-a-Race.htm

Yes, there are Jewish sects like the Karaites and Neturei Karta who appear to be more reasonable and relatively benign peoples in contrast to mainstream Talmudic Jews.  But they are an inconsequential minority among Jews, and who's to say they are not just another ruse concocted to mislead and confuse the hapless goyim thereby rendering them virtually defenseless against Talmudic Jews by diffusing their vigilance?  Let's be aware of the possibility of a Judaic variation on the good cop, bad cop ploy here.

Even though I personally find it absurd and conflicted for the reasons stated above, there are many Jews who call themselves atheists, true.  But even these atheist Jews do not fundamentally reject nor challenge the validity nor the legitimacy of the Jewish religion per se.  For in the end, paradoxically, the very religion they dismiss as their guiding principle in life, is the only thing that binds them together and underlies their assertion of a distinct Jewish identity and ethnicity.  

(If you know of something else that makes a Jew a Jew, please let me know.  With the caveat that mere assertions = false arguments.)

Bel,

I understand that you believe that Kabbalism is an extension of a
more ancient sinister cult than Judaism proper; one which has grafted itself uninvited onto the Judaic religion perhaps at the latter's expense and discomfit.

But your arbitrary and unwarranted dissection of these two now nevertheless fused together and unified traditions makes it appear as though Kabbalism somehow hijacked Judaism which was a pure and innocent religion before the Kabbalists piggybacked on it to further their distinct evil purposes.  

Indubitably, Judaism was, and is, evil in its unmitigated hatred of the rest of mankind.  

Not even the Karaites nor the Neturei Karta types openly and seriously challenge their "chosenness" which gives them the right to practice genocide on the goyim when necessary, do they?  Judaism is the original codification and institutionalization of racism.  Judaism *is* racism.  You only have to take a peek at the Talmud -- or the Torah, for that matter -- and read a few pages of history to see that.  So I would posit that it is rather mainstream Rabbinical Talmudic Judaism which has absorbed, assimilated and  molded to its purposes more ancient esoteric practices (which you associate with Kabbalism) most of which at least pretended to have some form of enlightenment or betterment as their ultimate goal -- in contrast to Judaism's stated purpose of world domination through racism-fueled genocide and mayhem.

Bel, you noted: "Factually challenged remark. The Torah remains the foundation of all 'judaisms'..."

Yet, all mainstream rebbes representing the *majority* of the Jews will attest to the supreme authority of the Talmud in private and at least tangentially, in public, by conceding that the Torah cannot be understood without the Talmud.  What the rebbes really think of the Talmud becomes apparent in light of the Rabbinical doctrine that God Himself consults the Talmud to gain knowledge and wisdom, which betrays the rebbes' belief that the Talmud is ultimately more authoritative than God Himself, therefore evincing primacy over God!  https://rense.com/general86/talmd.htm

You continue: "To this end, in those sects in which they - rabbinicals - have pre-eminent authority, the torah is downplayed, denigrated... or just plain ignored.  To say the least, this does not find favor with all sects of judaics"

You're right, Bel.  But the *majority* of Jews are closer to the Talmudic Rabbinical tradition that you despise.  Either by belief: https://www.rt.com/uk/430776-orthodox-conservative-jewish-population/

https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/study-haredim-to-become-majority-of-u-k-jews-by-2031-1.5409983

Or numbers: http://www.pewforum.org/2015/08/26/a-portrait-of-american-orthodox-jews/

Or by virtue of their worldview and general attitude: https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2017/03/report-israel-established-apartheid-regime-170315054053798.html

One good Jew does not atone for 100,000 real Jews.

Ask yourself: have you met one Jew, left, right or center, who seriously challenged the existence and legitimacy of apartheid state Israel?  

And before that, you wrote: "I will modestly tell you that I've done a better job of it so far than anyone else working in the field. For which I will invite your commendations... NOT condemnations."

Hey, Bel, I've plastered the entire alternative internet with links to your stuff.  Quoting someone countless times counts as a commendation instead of a condemnation, doesn't it?  

I'm going to share some of my personal thoughts now.  Perhaps you have some Jewish blood, Bel, and this renders you naturally defensive in the discussion of things Jewish?  Resulting in the subliminal inclination to subtly whitewash and exonerate Judaism by juxtaposing it to, thence de facto disassociating it from, Kabbalism, Frankism et al?  Or perhaps you are wary of being labeled an antisemite with the concomitant degradation of perceived credibility?  In any case, aren't you taking things a bit too personally at times?

Maybe, absolutely not -- neither.  I don't know.  

We can at least agree to countenance all these possibilities I hope?  You know I'm not your enemy.  I have lately endeavored to provide additional exposure for your blog all over the internet -- probably more than you have ever done it yourself, to the best of my knowledge.

Thanks.